<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MINI John Cooper Works: Superheroes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stillad.com/mini-john-cooper-works-superheroes-1286.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stillad.com/mini-john-cooper-works-superheroes-1286.htm</link>
	<description>Advertising Photography &#38; Print</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.stillad.com/mini-john-cooper-works-superheroes-1286.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillad.com/?p=1286#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>I am a fan of BMW and VW, but why put down the new VW Rabbit just to sell the BMW Mini?

I didn&#039;t really get the ad either, but the put-down was clear.

I think part of the problem stems from the name &quot;mini john cooper works&quot;.  In an ironic twist the name doesn&#039;t work.  

I get the Mini part, and the Cooper part, the Works is a tacky addon, but the John just befuddles me to no end.

A little history, the car originally called the Austin Mini or the Rover Mini was truncated to the Mini.  Then John Cooper started racing them and put a larger engine in them.  The Mini soon became known as the Mini Cooper because only the Cooper editions were in high demand.

Flash forward to the new (BMW) &#039;Mini Cooper&#039;, since the &#039;Cooper&#039; which used to distinguish the faster versions is now the name of the base model, and they already added an S to the supercharged version, I guess they had to add &#039;works&#039; onto the racy model.

I still don&#039;t understand the point of adding &#039;John&#039;, it is over-thought out and just seems to nail the lid on the whole &#039;BMW don&#039;t get how British the mini is supposed to be&#039; thing.  The analogue to this would be the marketing of Von Dutch to mall-going lolcats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a fan of BMW and VW, but why put down the new VW Rabbit just to sell the BMW Mini?</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really get the ad either, but the put-down was clear.</p>
<p>I think part of the problem stems from the name &#8220;mini john cooper works&#8221;.  In an ironic twist the name doesn&#8217;t work.  </p>
<p>I get the Mini part, and the Cooper part, the Works is a tacky addon, but the John just befuddles me to no end.</p>
<p>A little history, the car originally called the Austin Mini or the Rover Mini was truncated to the Mini.  Then John Cooper started racing them and put a larger engine in them.  The Mini soon became known as the Mini Cooper because only the Cooper editions were in high demand.</p>
<p>Flash forward to the new (BMW) &#8216;Mini Cooper&#8217;, since the &#8216;Cooper&#8217; which used to distinguish the faster versions is now the name of the base model, and they already added an S to the supercharged version, I guess they had to add &#8216;works&#8217; onto the racy model.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t understand the point of adding &#8216;John&#8217;, it is over-thought out and just seems to nail the lid on the whole &#8216;BMW don&#8217;t get how British the mini is supposed to be&#8217; thing.  The analogue to this would be the marketing of Von Dutch to mall-going lolcats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
